Bollywood superstar Salman Khan recently made headlines with a bold statement that left fans and critics alike buzzing: 'Sikandar wasn't the flop—it was the director's mismanagement that sank the ship.' But here's where it gets controversial... During the latest Weekend Ka Vaar episode of Bigg Boss 19, Salman didn't hold back as he addressed long-standing rumors and controversies, including his feud with singer Arijit Singh and his public clash with Sikandar director AR Murugadoss. And this is the part most people miss—Salman's candid revelations shed light on the complexities of the film industry, where blame often gets shifted instead of problems being solved.
For the first time, Salman openly discussed his tiff with Arijit Singh, admitting it stemmed from a misunderstanding on his part. 'Arijit and I are very good friends,' he clarified, adding that they've since resolved their differences, with Arijit even lending his voice to Salman's film Tiger 3. This revelation humanizes the star, showing that even celebrities aren't immune to miscommunication. But it also raises a question: How often do we jump to conclusions without knowing the full story?
However, Salman's tone shifted dramatically when he addressed AR Murugadoss's comments about his alleged tardiness on the Sikandar set. 'I used to arrive at 9 PM, and that became an issue,' Salman said sarcastically, before delivering a scathing counterpoint. He pointed out that Murugadoss's recent film Madharaasi—which featured an actor who arrived at 6 AM—was an even bigger box office disaster. 'If punctuality guarantees success, why did Madharaasi flop harder than Sikandar?' Salman asked, challenging the director's narrative. This isn't just a celebrity feud—it's a debate about accountability and professionalism in Bollywood.
The controversy deepens when Salman criticizes producer Sajid Nadiadwala for 'escaping' responsibility. 'First, it was Murugadoss and Nadiadwala's film. Then Nadiadwala left, and Murugadoss went back to directing in the South,' Salman stated, implying a lack of commitment from both parties. This raises a thought-provoking question: Who truly bears the blame when a film fails—the star, the director, or the producer?
The feud between Salman and Murugadoss dates back to an interview where the director complained about Salman's late arrivals, claiming it disrupted the filming schedule. 'Shooting with a star isn't easy,' Murugadoss had said, recounting instances where child actors had to shoot late-night scenes meant for daytime. But Salman's rebuttal flips the script, suggesting that poor management, not his timing, was the real issue.
So, what do you think? Is Salman justified in his criticism, or is he deflecting blame? Does punctuality determine a film's success, or is it just one piece of a larger puzzle? Let us know in the comments—this debate is far from over!
